Striking down Mandatory Provision arbitration

Go down

Striking down Mandatory Provision arbitration Empty Striking down Mandatory Provision arbitration

Post  Admin on Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:28 am

It's not a secret that just about every employer would prefer arbitrating an employment dispute with an employee rather than facing a trial of jury who is much more driven by emotion and thus - much more likely to award large damages to the aggrieved employee than a conservative judge-arbitrator.
Employee attorneys routinely manage to successfully argue in courts that their clients' arbitration agreements are unconscionable and thus unenforceable, referring the employment dispute back to court for a jury trial.

Here are some of the common reasons your arbitration agreement with an employer might be invalid and unenforceable:
http://www.sanfranciscoemploymentlawfirm.com/2008/10/arbitration_agreements.html

Arkady Itkin
www.arkadylaw.com
San Francisco Employment and Injury Lawyer

Admin
Admin

Posts : 15
Join date : 2008-08-30
Age : 40
Location : San Francisco, California

View user profile http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net

Back to top Go down

Striking down Mandatory Provision arbitration Empty Re: Striking down Mandatory Provision arbitration

Post  JoeC (McGruff) on Mon Oct 13, 2008 5:30 am

Did you read this decision out of Georgia 11th Cir Lambert v. Austin? Unbelievable!
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0710651p.pdf
JoeC
JoeC (McGruff)
JoeC (McGruff)
Admin

Posts : 705
Join date : 2008-08-31
Age : 58
Location : Seattle Wa

View user profile

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum