Striking down Mandatory Provision arbitration
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Striking down Mandatory Provision arbitration
It's not a secret that just about every employer would prefer arbitrating an employment dispute with an employee rather than facing a trial of jury who is much more driven by emotion and thus - much more likely to award large damages to the aggrieved employee than a conservative judge-arbitrator.
Employee attorneys routinely manage to successfully argue in courts that their clients' arbitration agreements are unconscionable and thus unenforceable, referring the employment dispute back to court for a jury trial.
Here are some of the common reasons your arbitration agreement with an employer might be invalid and unenforceable:
http://www.sanfranciscoemploymentlawfirm.com/2008/10/arbitration_agreements.html
Arkady Itkin
www.arkadylaw.com
San Francisco Employment and Injury Lawyer
Employee attorneys routinely manage to successfully argue in courts that their clients' arbitration agreements are unconscionable and thus unenforceable, referring the employment dispute back to court for a jury trial.
Here are some of the common reasons your arbitration agreement with an employer might be invalid and unenforceable:
http://www.sanfranciscoemploymentlawfirm.com/2008/10/arbitration_agreements.html
Arkady Itkin
www.arkadylaw.com
San Francisco Employment and Injury Lawyer
Admin- Admin
- Posts: 14
Join date: 2008-08-30
Age: 31
Location: San Francisco, California

Re: Striking down Mandatory Provision arbitration
Did you read this decision out of Georgia 11th Cir Lambert v. Austin? Unbelievable!
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0710651p.pdf
JoeC
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/11th/0710651p.pdf
JoeC
JoeC (McGruff)- Admin
- Posts: 557
Join date: 2008-08-31
Age: 49
Location: Seattle Wa
Permissions of this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum





