<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Labor Law (Union)</title>
		<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/-t1.htm</link>
		<description>National Labor Relations Act (N.L.R.A), Railway Labor Act (R.L.A).  Labor law effecting non-union employees.</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:19:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>railway act question</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/railway-act-question-t247.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>buddy0272</dc:creator>
			<description>Ok,  let me explain this,  a couple of contracts ago with my company they put in wording in the contract that says thru the last day of the contract ( in this case sept 30th) they are to give step increases on the anniversary date of the employee.   All the previous contracts they had continued giving these increases even after the contract was up and in negotiations.   However this year  they halted all increases after sept 30th.    But they say that we are running under the rules of the old  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/railway-act-question-t247.htm#1226</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/railway-act-question-t247.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Unfair Labor Practice Charge</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unfair-labor-practice-charge-t241.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>mcarson</dc:creator>
			<description>I wanted to take a moment to share with everyone, here on this board, the situation I am currently dealing with. Back in July I had a union business agent (&quot;BA&quot;) come out to the job site because of a workplace issue. The employer discharged me only hours later. The BA did nothing about this and I have filed an unfair labor practice against the company. The only problem is I don't have very good evidence to prove that I was terminated for engaging in union activity. I know the other  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:13:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unfair-labor-practice-charge-t241.htm#1201</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unfair-labor-practice-charge-t241.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NMB Election NPRM</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/nmb-election-nprm-t243.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Mr. Pink</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[The NMB issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on changing its election procedure.  The NPRM can be found here:
<br />

<br />
<a href="http://www.nmb.gov/representation/repvotingproposal_11-03-09.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.nmb.gov/representation/repvotingproposal_11-03-09.pdf</a>
<br />

<br />
Mr. Pink]]></description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:54:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/nmb-election-nprm-t243.htm#1209</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/nmb-election-nprm-t243.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BLET President</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/blet-president-t239.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Mr. Pink</dc:creator>
			<description>Union leader arrested, charged with bribery



WASHINGTON — The president of a national railroad employees union was arrested at his Ohio home on Tuesday and charged with bribery.



Edward Rodzwicz, who heads the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, is accused of soliciting and accepting &#36;20,000 in bribes from a St. Louis lawyer. In exchange, prosecutors say, Rodzwicz allowed the lawyer to remain on a list of attorneys approved to handle injury cases for union members.



http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jXvOhcjAgEw4r5eG-RkwCvTIjqDwD9BAI5FO0



Mr.  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/blet-president-t239.htm#1198</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/blet-president-t239.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wongful termination West Virginia</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/wongful-termination-west-virginia-t236.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>CATMANDO8426</dc:creator>
			<description>A union member was suspended when he reported to work on August 3rd 2009, the employer told him that the term of the suspension was pending the outcome of an investigation into a workers compensation claim he had filed. On August 12th the member received a letter telling him that his employment was being terminated for attempting to wrongfully obtain workers compensation benefits after the insurance provider denied the claim. The employee promptly sough legal counsel and has appealed the decision.  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:17:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/wongful-termination-west-virginia-t236.htm#1185</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/wongful-termination-west-virginia-t236.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Unions Are Good for the American Economy</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unions-are-good-for-the-american-economy-t235.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>mcarson</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[Old article but a good read nonetheless. Hope it is okay to post it in this forum.
<br />

<br />
<a href="http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/2009/02/efca_factsheets.html" target="_blank">http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/2009/02/efca_factsheets.html</a>]]></description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unions-are-good-for-the-american-economy-t235.htm#1184</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unions-are-good-for-the-american-economy-t235.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is this wrongful termination? Florida</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/is-this-wrongful-termination-florida-t214.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>ankylos</dc:creator>
			<description>Long story short, 

Its a union shop and we(the employees) and the company are governed by a set of rules and policies in a labor contract. I told my immediate supervisor that I wasn't going to do something (which many of us do as an empty threat to indicate we're upset at something which we eventually do anyway). He went to get his boss (the shift supervisor). I got into an argument with him and he told me to leave. &quot;I'm telling you to leave the company premises!&quot; I have a witness  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/is-this-wrongful-termination-florida-t214.htm#1040</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/is-this-wrongful-termination-florida-t214.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>comprehensive guide</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/comprehensive-guide-t148.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>CATMANDO8426</dc:creator>
			<description>Im going through the NLRA and the NLRB website and there is a wealth of information there to be had. However is there a comprehensive guide to this information written for the benefit of the layperson. Concerted activities, and what rules have been set forth from the written law, such as wiengarten.</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:49:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/comprehensive-guide-t148.htm#748</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/comprehensive-guide-t148.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>unclear language</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unclear-language-t161.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>CATMANDO8426</dc:creator>
			<description>THIS MANUAL IS NOT INTENDED TO BE OR TO CREATE A CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT. THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP OF EACH EMPLOYEE IS &quot;AT-WILL.&quot; THAT MEANS THAT IT IS FOR NO DEFINITE PERIOD AND IS TERMINABLE AT ANY TIME AT THE WILL OF THE EMPLOYEE OR WALKER WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE, CAUSE OR COMPENSATION.



THIS MANUAL SUPERSEDES AND CANCELS ANY AND ALL PRIOR POLICIES OF WALKER, ORAL OR WRITTEN. AND ANY POLICIES, PROCEDURES, MANUAL EDITIONS AND/ OR RULES PREVIOUSLY IN EFFECT. 



While Walker  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 01:22:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unclear-language-t161.htm#803</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unclear-language-t161.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>duty of fair representation</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/duty-of-fair-representation-t150.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>CATMANDO8426</dc:creator>
			<description>I know the definition of this term, but how if necessary does one hold a union accountable for failing in its duties. Such as refusing to hear a grievance where an employee believed that he/she was denied his/her right to representation during a meeting that he/she reasonably believed could lead to disciplinary action, or for not taking on a case where the company engaged in an adverse action for the employees invocation of his/her union rights as outlined in the CBA? Does this also fall under  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 01:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/duty-of-fair-representation-t150.htm#771</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/duty-of-fair-representation-t150.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>I think this belongs here?!</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/i-think-this-belongs-here-t141.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>wmskrainski</dc:creator>
			<description>Connecticut.

I think I have a claim against an employer, though i'm having a hard time finding an Attorny to take the case. Maybe someone here can tell me why.

I was hired by a Metro area Railroad as an Ironworker. After being employed for a few weeks I was offered a job as a driver of a commercial sized welding truck. The requirements for the job were a CDL and a valid Medical examiners certificate. 

The company doctor provided the certificate. I went to Manhattan for the appointment.  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 18:16:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/i-think-this-belongs-here-t141.htm#713</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/i-think-this-belongs-here-t141.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Someone told me to come here...</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/someone-told-me-to-come-here-t60.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>macchan</dc:creator>
			<description>so here is my first topic of what could be many, because the issues I have had with my termination are many and I am still in the process of trying to get an attorney but I have to go thru the union process first.



In 2003 NMFA theft or dishonesty of any kind was Cardinal Sin terminated on first offense under work rules its now in CBA as #3 contract.



New 2008 Contract says all rules in contract 3 must be followed unless addressed in a supplement.  this was in #2 contract.



2008 Supplement  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:55:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/someone-told-me-to-come-here-t60.htm#280</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/someone-told-me-to-come-here-t60.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Refusal of disclosure</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/refusal-of-disclosure-t77.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>CATMANDO8426</dc:creator>
			<description>Under our CBA there are three different catagories of job classifications Mechanic I, Mechanic II, and Mechanic IIa in the machine shop. In the parts shop there is Parts Person I Part Person II and Parts Person IIa. The first two categories top rate of pay increase every year according to the amount of the yearly union rate increase, the IIa calssification however does not ever change. Every inquiry that has been made as to whether or not the IIa classification qualifies for a rate increase has  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:36:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/refusal-of-disclosure-t77.htm#418</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/refusal-of-disclosure-t77.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Revitalizing the Union mentality</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/revitalizing-the-union-mentality-t34.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>CATMANDO8426</dc:creator>
			<description>Recently, I decided to distribute some literature concerning our Union rights in the workplace. I hope to encourage my coworkers to get more involved with our Union in preparation for our contract negotiations starting in November. This literature contains  information such as our Weingarten rights (thank you Joe) as well as statistics showing how Union membership is on the rise and steps to improve solidarity in our workplace. One of my coworkers has asked about why our Union doesn't provide  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 04:29:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/revitalizing-the-union-mentality-t34.htm#184</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/revitalizing-the-union-mentality-t34.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>U.C.L.A Report/ Meg Sullivan</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/ucla-report-meg-sullivan-t24.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>U.S. unionization levels rose substantially this year, defying a decades-long trend of decline, according to a report by UCLA's Institute for Research on Labor and Employment.



&quot;The State of the Unions in 2008: A Profile of Union Membership in Los Angeles, California and the Nation&quot; shows unionization rates nationwide rising half a percentage point over the 2007 level, to 12.6 percent of all U.S. civilian workers in 2008. The rate rose one-tenth of a percentage point between 2006  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:15:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/ucla-report-meg-sullivan-t24.htm#128</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/ucla-report-meg-sullivan-t24.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>