<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Legal hounds</title>
		<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/feed/?</link>
		<description>Latest topics</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:19:51 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>UIA redetermination? is it a waste of time</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/uia-redetermination-is-it-a-waste-of-time-t246.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>dyk301</dc:creator>
			<description>I was still collecting unemployment when I started to work for my new employer. the hours were different from what I was used to. Had a corporate job. When I was offered a position at with this employer, it was less than 70% of my prior employer. The position I had applied for was management but when offered I was a sales rep. I was told I was going to be working on the campaign I had applied for after I had learned the basic on a different campaign. 

I was fired for NCNS for a holiday. I only  ...</description>
			<category>Employment Law</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 06:06:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/uia-redetermination-is-it-a-waste-of-time-t246.htm#1225</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/uia-redetermination-is-it-a-waste-of-time-t246.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>railway act question</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/railway-act-question-t247.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>buddy0272</dc:creator>
			<description>Ok,  let me explain this,  a couple of contracts ago with my company they put in wording in the contract that says thru the last day of the contract ( in this case sept 30th) they are to give step increases on the anniversary date of the employee.   All the previous contracts they had continued giving these increases even after the contract was up and in negotiations.   However this year  they halted all increases after sept 30th.    But they say that we are running under the rules of the old  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:19:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/railway-act-question-t247.htm#1226</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/railway-act-question-t247.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>No Job Posting!</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/no-job-posting-t245.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>mikeb14</dc:creator>
			<description>My company has hired several people to fill vague positions that were never posted and don't have a job description. These people may be earning near the same or more than me. I have been there 26 years. I am a successful sales manager and have, needless to say, vast experience with this company. I have been asking for additional responsibilities (training new sales staff, working with other divisions, etc) for years. I have been able to do some of that (with good feedback). Recently, however,  ...</description>
			<category>Employment Law</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:19:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/no-job-posting-t245.htm#1220</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/no-job-posting-t245.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Lipnic Nominated for EEOC Commissioner.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/lipnic-nominated-for-eeoc-commissioner-t244.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[President Obama has nominated Republican Victoria Lipnic to the EEOC. Lipnic has an extensive background in employment law, serving as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Employment Standards in the prior administration.  She was responsible for administration and enforcement of the FMLA and FSLA, among other things, and counsel for the House Committee on Education and Labor. Most recently she was of counsel at Seyfarth Shaw. 
<br />
JoeC (McGruff)]]></description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 16:41:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/lipnic-nominated-for-eeoc-commissioner-t244.htm#1218</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/lipnic-nominated-for-eeoc-commissioner-t244.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Unfair Labor Practice Charge</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unfair-labor-practice-charge-t241.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>mcarson</dc:creator>
			<description>I wanted to take a moment to share with everyone, here on this board, the situation I am currently dealing with. Back in July I had a union business agent (&quot;BA&quot;) come out to the job site because of a workplace issue. The employer discharged me only hours later. The BA did nothing about this and I have filed an unfair labor practice against the company. The only problem is I don't have very good evidence to prove that I was terminated for engaging in union activity. I know the other  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 04:13:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unfair-labor-practice-charge-t241.htm#1201</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unfair-labor-practice-charge-t241.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Nazi cbg award of the month goes to this clown!</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/the-nazi-cbg-award-of-the-month-goes-to-this-clown-t242.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>Larry Whitten earns the Nazi cbg award for being an asshole. He marched into this northern New Mexico town in late July on a mission: resurrect a failing hotel.



At which point he immediately laid down some new rules. Among them, forbidding the Hispanic workers at the run-down, Southwestern adobe-style hotel from speaking Spanish in his presence (he thought they'd be talking about him), and ordered some to Anglicize their names.



I would suspect that before cowboying on in to New Mexico  ...</description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:09:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/the-nazi-cbg-award-of-the-month-goes-to-this-clown-t242.htm#1207</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/the-nazi-cbg-award-of-the-month-goes-to-this-clown-t242.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NMB Election NPRM</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/nmb-election-nprm-t243.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Mr. Pink</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[The NMB issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) on changing its election procedure.  The NPRM can be found here:
<br />

<br />
<a href="http://www.nmb.gov/representation/repvotingproposal_11-03-09.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.nmb.gov/representation/repvotingproposal_11-03-09.pdf</a>
<br />

<br />
Mr. Pink]]></description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:54:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/nmb-election-nprm-t243.htm#1209</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/nmb-election-nprm-t243.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Missing avatars</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/site-feed-back-and-improvements-f12/missing-avatars-t240.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[I noticed many avatars have disappeared.  I am not sure why, the only thing I can say at this point is go to the user profile and delete your avatar if it is not appearing.  Then replace it.
<br />
JoeC (McGruff)]]></description>
			<category>Site Feed back and Improvements</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:03:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/site-feed-back-and-improvements-f12/missing-avatars-t240.htm#1200</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/site-feed-back-and-improvements-f12/missing-avatars-t240.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>BLET President</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/blet-president-t239.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Mr. Pink</dc:creator>
			<description>Union leader arrested, charged with bribery



WASHINGTON — The president of a national railroad employees union was arrested at his Ohio home on Tuesday and charged with bribery.



Edward Rodzwicz, who heads the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, is accused of soliciting and accepting &#36;20,000 in bribes from a St. Louis lawyer. In exchange, prosecutors say, Rodzwicz allowed the lawyer to remain on a list of attorneys approved to handle injury cases for union members.



http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jXvOhcjAgEw4r5eG-RkwCvTIjqDwD9BAI5FO0



Mr.  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/blet-president-t239.htm#1198</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/blet-president-t239.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wongful termination West Virginia</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/wongful-termination-west-virginia-t236.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>CATMANDO8426</dc:creator>
			<description>A union member was suspended when he reported to work on August 3rd 2009, the employer told him that the term of the suspension was pending the outcome of an investigation into a workers compensation claim he had filed. On August 12th the member received a letter telling him that his employment was being terminated for attempting to wrongfully obtain workers compensation benefits after the insurance provider denied the claim. The employee promptly sough legal counsel and has appealed the decision.  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:17:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/wongful-termination-west-virginia-t236.htm#1185</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/wongful-termination-west-virginia-t236.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Been away from the board a while.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/been-away-from-the-board-a-while-t237.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[I have not been posting much due to the fact that I am currently studying a pending case before the supreme court.  Regarding a procedural rule of R.L.A and whether the N.R.A.B erred in dismissing the case.  Any one interested in reviewing can read here and follow the links.  Oral arguments were heard October 7Th. <a href="http://topics.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/08-604" target="_blank">http://topics.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/08-604</a>
<br />
JoeC (McGruff)]]></description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:41:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/been-away-from-the-board-a-while-t237.htm#1187</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/been-away-from-the-board-a-while-t237.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>EEOC Will Hold Town Hall Meetings on new ADAAA Regs.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/eeoc-will-hold-town-hall-meetings-on-new-adaaa-regs-t238.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>http://eeoc.gov/press/10-7-09.html



Each town hall meeting will consist of two sessions, one for disability advocates and one for the employer community, offering opportunities for both the business and disability communities to comment in person. The meetings will take place by Nov. 20 in Philadelphia, Chicago, San Francisco and New Orleans.



Any member of this forum interested is encouraged to attend and post.

JoeC (McGruff) </description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:12:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/eeoc-will-hold-town-hall-meetings-on-new-adaaa-regs-t238.htm#1192</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/eeoc-will-hold-town-hall-meetings-on-new-adaaa-regs-t238.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Unions Are Good for the American Economy</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unions-are-good-for-the-american-economy-t235.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>mcarson</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[Old article but a good read nonetheless. Hope it is okay to post it in this forum.
<br />

<br />
<a href="http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/2009/02/efca_factsheets.html" target="_blank">http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/2009/02/efca_factsheets.html</a>]]></description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 21:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unions-are-good-for-the-american-economy-t235.htm#1184</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/unions-are-good-for-the-american-economy-t235.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Defect of Process</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/defect-of-process-t231.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>nckrystalblue</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[Hello! Hope everyone is well...it's been awhile since my last visit.
<br />

<br />
Please define/explain the term &quot;defect of process&quot; as it relates to an Unemployment Appeal. My initial thought is that it implies a violation of commission regulations (to which you previously linked me to, thanks) during the course of proceeding.
<br />

<br />
I just want to be clear in my understanding.
<br />

<br />
Thanks!
<br />
KB]]></description>
			<category>State Unemployment Insurance.</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:26:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/defect-of-process-t231.htm#1170</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/defect-of-process-t231.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The employee free choice act.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/the-employee-free-choice-act-t26.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[Here is a video and some information on the pending legislation.
<br />
<a href="http://freechoiceact.org/page/invite/yournewjobtaf" target="_blank">http://freechoiceact.org/page/invite/yournewjobtaf</a>]]></description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 01:16:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/the-employee-free-choice-act-t26.htm#141</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/the-employee-free-choice-act-t26.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Superior Court vs. Small Claims</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/unsure-miscellaneous-f26/superior-court-vs-small-claims-t230.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>mcarson</dc:creator>
			<description>I know there are a few attorneys that post here. Would it be permissible and how difficult would it be for a layperson, whom is unfamiliar with court proceedings, to bring a case to the civil division of the superior court pro se rather than going through small claims? I am hesitant to go through small claims court as I understand the cases are not always heard by judes and they many times are not well versed on CA labor laws.</description>
			<category>Unsure-Miscellaneous</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:12:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/unsure-miscellaneous-f26/superior-court-vs-small-claims-t230.htm#1159</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/unsure-miscellaneous-f26/superior-court-vs-small-claims-t230.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Overpayment</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/overpayment-t233.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>nckrystalblue</dc:creator>
			<description>If you are awarded benefits and it is later determined (4 months later) that you were not qualified for such benefits do you have to pay them back and if so, how do you know? Do they include that as part of the determination letter or do they wait until all appeals have been exhausted and last decision is final...



Also, if repayment is necessary, how do they go about collecting it? 4 months of benefits is a big chunk of money for lump sum payment and what if person is still unemployed?



Thanks,

KB </description>
			<category>State Unemployment Insurance.</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:44:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/overpayment-t233.htm#1172</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/overpayment-t233.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wow this just came across as an E-Mail alert.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/wow-this-just-came-across-as-an-e-mail-alert-t229.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>Court, not arbitrator, must decide whether arbitration agreement is unconscionable, 9th Circuit rules.



Anyone read this case? 



The case arose after Antonio Jackson sued his employer, Rent-A-Center West Inc. (Rent-A-Center), for race discrimination and retaliation. Rent-A-Center asked the lower court to compel arbitration pursuant to an agreement Jackson signed, which stated &quot;the Arbitrator, and not any federal, state, or local court or agency, shall have exclusive authority to  ...</description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:47:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/wow-this-just-came-across-as-an-e-mail-alert-t229.htm#1153</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/wow-this-just-came-across-as-an-e-mail-alert-t229.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Stats are in...</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/site-feed-back-and-improvements-f12/stats-are-in-t228.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[This site ranked 7th out of 585 sites in the sub forum for PHPPBB boards, not to shabby with a steady growth in users of 8% a month. Thank you to all who participate. <a href="http://www.forumotion.com/en/Economy-Law-Finance/Law-Justice-8-0-point-desc-m.htm" target="_blank">http://www.forumotion.com/en/Economy-Law-Finance/Law-Justice-8-0-point-desc-m.htm</a>
<br />
JoeC (McGruff)]]></description>
			<category>Site Feed back and Improvements</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:27:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/site-feed-back-and-improvements-f12/stats-are-in-t228.htm#1149</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/site-feed-back-and-improvements-f12/stats-are-in-t228.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Norma Rae dead at 68.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/norma-rae-dead-at-68-t225.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/us/15sutton.html" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/us/15sutton.html</a>
<br />
JoeC (McGruff)]]></description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:07:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/norma-rae-dead-at-68-t225.htm#1137</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/norma-rae-dead-at-68-t225.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Brinker Restaurant Corp. Case - California</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/brinker-restaurant-corp-case-california-t227.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>mcarson</dc:creator>
			<description>Has there been any developments in the review by the supreme court? Any information I've found is almost a year old. Has anyone followed this case?</description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 05:49:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/brinker-restaurant-corp-case-california-t227.htm#1143</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/brinker-restaurant-corp-case-california-t227.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>ada and eeoc case on disability leave</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-discrimination-f6/ada-and-eeoc-case-on-disability-leave-t226.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>theretoo</dc:creator>
			<description>http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/americans-with-disabilities-act-ada-inflexible-medical-leave-policies-may-violate-the-americans-with-disabilities-act.html



http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/americans-with-disabilities-act-ada-ninth-circuit-holding-reminds-employers-to-think-carefully-before-denying-requested-accommodations.html



apparently ups has some 'disabilty' issues </description>
			<category>Employment Discrimination</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:22:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-discrimination-f6/ada-and-eeoc-case-on-disability-leave-t226.htm#1139</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-discrimination-f6/ada-and-eeoc-case-on-disability-leave-t226.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>northern ca discrimination case currently with feha</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-discrimination-f6/northern-ca-discrimination-case-currently-with-feha-t224.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>theretoo</dc:creator>
			<description>i have seen atty's from the sf area have posted here and may have access to dfeh case info on-line

mine should be right there, filed in april '09, i am in solano county



i will try to be brief in the details, however, i am note that i am currently looking for representation for myself in the case. my current thoughts are to bring an atty on board for litigation at the completion of the feha investigation



last i knew, the current status of the case was that the employer has refused  ...</description>
			<category>Employment Discrimination</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:32:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-discrimination-f6/northern-ca-discrimination-case-currently-with-feha-t224.htm#1130</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-discrimination-f6/northern-ca-discrimination-case-currently-with-feha-t224.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Should Michael Vick be allowed to return to pro football?</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/should-michael-vick-be-allowed-to-return-to-pro-football-t199.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[McGruff dont think so.
<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHBN8TCdFBU" target="_blank"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHBN8TCdFBU" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHBN8TCdFBU</a></a>
<br />
JoeC (McGruff)]]></description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:06:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/should-michael-vick-be-allowed-to-return-to-pro-football-t199.htm#985</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/should-michael-vick-be-allowed-to-return-to-pro-football-t199.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>bounced paychecks</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/wage-and-hour-laws-f13/bounced-paychecks-t220.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Hardlabor</dc:creator>
			<description>I saved all my weekly pay checks for three weeks and deposited them into my checking account. Two of them came back insufficient funds.



I provided all the copies of the returned checks and the returned check fees to my account to the temp agency by fax early this week.



They denied receiving them and did not issue new checks on friday  this week.



I am tired of dealing with the deceptive and deliberate stall methods.



What kind of compensation am I entitled too? 



I have  ...</description>
			<category>Wage and Hour Laws</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:26:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/wage-and-hour-laws-f13/bounced-paychecks-t220.htm#1096</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/wage-and-hour-laws-f13/bounced-paychecks-t220.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>E-Verify for Federal Contractors Goes into Effect Sept. 8 - Clears Court Hurdle.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/e-verify-for-federal-contractors-goes-into-effect-sept-8-clears-court-hurdle-t222.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[Via Ross Runkel comes news that the Federal Agency Acquisition Council's new rule that requires federal contractors to use the E-Verify program to confirm that new and existing employees are eligible to work in the United States has survived a federal challenge. 
<br />

<br />
<a href="http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2009/08/court_approves.html" target="_blank">http://www.lawmemo.com/blog/2009/08/court_approves.html</a>]]></description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 14:44:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/e-verify-for-federal-contractors-goes-into-effect-sept-8-clears-court-hurdle-t222.htm#1114</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/e-verify-for-federal-contractors-goes-into-effect-sept-8-clears-court-hurdle-t222.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Client Files</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/attorney-client-relationship-f11/client-files-t193.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>nckrystalblue</dc:creator>
			<description>NC laws apply to my questions

I am speaking in generalities as the case in question is still active.



1. What forms of communication between a plaintiff's lawyer and all involved parties (defense lawyer, commissions, mediators, drs etc.) are part of the case file to which one is entitled to receive should that lawyer cease to be the plaintiff's lawyer?



Ex. A: Plaintiff went to their lawyer to discuss increasing harassment on the job and not having WC related medical restrictions followed  ...</description>
			<category>Attorney Client Relationship</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/attorney-client-relationship-f11/client-files-t193.htm#944</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/attorney-client-relationship-f11/client-files-t193.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Have not read it but sounds good</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/book-review-f15/have-not-read-it-but-sounds-good-t221.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>Ken Dau-Schmidt, Seth Harris, and Orly Lobel have published a book (Edward Elgar Publishing) Labor and Employment Law and Economics.



http://www.e-elgar.co.uk/Bookentry_contents.lasso?id=13000  &#36;315.00  I think Sposito should buy it and write a review.



Here's a brief description from the publisher:

The economic analysis of labor and employment law is a bold effort to apply economic theory to explain important empirical facts about the regulation of the employment relationship and  ...</description>
			<category>Book Review</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:50:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/book-review-f15/have-not-read-it-but-sounds-good-t221.htm#1112</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/book-review-f15/have-not-read-it-but-sounds-good-t221.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Terminated - Feedback please..definitely discrimiation...CA! California</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-discrimination-f6/terminated-feedback-pleasedefinitely-discrimiationca-california-t210.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>wazuri77</dc:creator>
			<description>hi all

so i was hired at this job and was working there for about 2.5 months. my immediate supervisor was a white female and i was the only african american and male reporting to her. all my colleagues were white females... although i was told by my supervisor via emails and verbally that i was doing a great job my employment was terminated. her reason was that she felt i was only doing a good job because i was on probation, that i was not providing &quot;reasonable eye contact&quot; and she  ...</description>
			<category>Employment Discrimination</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:11:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-discrimination-f6/terminated-feedback-pleasedefinitely-discrimiationca-california-t210.htm#1030</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-discrimination-f6/terminated-feedback-pleasedefinitely-discrimiationca-california-t210.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>White CT Firefighters prevail</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/white-ct-firefighters-prevail-t179.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Eng&amp;amp;SafetyMgr</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[Bravo F'in Zulu, about time this case got settled.
<br />

<br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31609275/ns/politics-white_house" target="_blank">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31609275/ns/politics-white_house</a>
<br />

<br />
Hopefully this will start to interject some damn common sense into todays &quot;modern&quot; Fire Service.]]></description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:49:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/white-ct-firefighters-prevail-t179.htm#881</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/white-ct-firefighters-prevail-t179.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Excellent new link from the DOL.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/wage-and-hour-laws-f13/excellent-new-link-from-the-dol-t204.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[This new link gives a map with all 50 states minimum wage.
<br />
<a href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/america.htm" target="_blank"><a href="http://www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/america.htm" target="_blank">http://www.dol.gov/esa/minwage/america.htm</a></a>
<br />
 
<br />
Also today, the federal minimum wage is &#36;7.25.  Some state minimum wage laws exceed the federal rate.
<br />
JoeC (McGruff)]]></description>
			<category>Wage and Hour Laws</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:58:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/wage-and-hour-laws-f13/excellent-new-link-from-the-dol-t204.htm#1019</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/wage-and-hour-laws-f13/excellent-new-link-from-the-dol-t204.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Job seekers beware!</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/job-seekers-beware-t219.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>The New York Times has an article on the low life practices taking advantage of the unemployed. Some job search firms that charge high fees, promise access to &quot;hidden&quot; or &quot;unpublished&quot; jobs, and deliver little in return. From the article:



“Career management” or “career marketing” companies . . . which charge large up-front fees, are easy to stumble upon on employment Web sites. Often . . . they contact job seekers after they post their résumés. They usually focus on professionals  ...</description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:41:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/job-seekers-beware-t219.htm#1084</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/job-seekers-beware-t219.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FLSA in Georgia</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/attorney-client-relationship-f11/flsa-in-georgia-t218.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>wanttobepaid</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<font color="red">Moved by Admin</font>
<br />
How in the heck does someone find a FLSA attorney in Georgia?  Is that term, FLSA, what I use for a search or am I looking in the wrong direction?  I did google Plaintiff Employment Lawyer but Workman's Comp attorneys kept popping up.  What am I missing or not doing correctly?   Thanks]]></description>
			<category>Attorney Client Relationship</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/attorney-client-relationship-f11/flsa-in-georgia-t218.htm#1061</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/attorney-client-relationship-f11/flsa-in-georgia-t218.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>taxpayer funded, California state contract attorneys</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/attorney-client-relationship-f11/taxpayer-funded-california-state-contract-attorneys-t217.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Jaded</dc:creator>
			<description>Ive been patiently waiting for Arnold to leave office so that the wheels of justice can begin to turn back again more in favor of the employee, in California, as I have an almost 3 year old workers compensation claim that is still being resisted. 



Meanwhile, our Federal government has again done nothing to help the individual. I just received a letter from an EEOC investigator stating that the reason I was not rehired by California was due to references that indicated I had trouble getting  ...</description>
			<category>Attorney Client Relationship</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 04:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/attorney-client-relationship-f11/taxpayer-funded-california-state-contract-attorneys-t217.htm#1054</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/attorney-client-relationship-f11/taxpayer-funded-california-state-contract-attorneys-t217.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A three year old opinon that caught my eye.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/a-three-year-old-opinon-that-caught-my-eye-t215.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>Once and a while you come across an opinion where a Judge relies on dicta and comes to a sound conclusion. Such is the case in this opinion handed down where the Judges draws his conclusion from historical text (Colorado Fuel &amp; Iron Company) finds in favor of the striking union and reasons:

[I]n the Ludlow Massacre, the employers asked the government by way of the National Guard to keep the union in line with bullets. [H]ere, the Railroads are asking the government to cripple unions with  ...</description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:56:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/a-three-year-old-opinon-that-caught-my-eye-t215.htm#1051</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/a-three-year-old-opinon-that-caught-my-eye-t215.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>A four day work week?</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/a-four-day-work-week-t208.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/in_praise_of_the_four-day_workweek.php" target="_blank"><a href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/in_praise_of_the_four-day_workweek.php" target="_blank">http://business.theatlantic.com/2009/07/in_praise_of_the_four-day_workweek.php</a></a>
<br />
(Write later)]]></description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 13:23:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/a-four-day-work-week-t208.htm#1026</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/a-four-day-work-week-t208.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is this wrongful termination? Florida</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/is-this-wrongful-termination-florida-t214.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>ankylos</dc:creator>
			<description>Long story short, 

Its a union shop and we(the employees) and the company are governed by a set of rules and policies in a labor contract. I told my immediate supervisor that I wasn't going to do something (which many of us do as an empty threat to indicate we're upset at something which we eventually do anyway). He went to get his boss (the shift supervisor). I got into an argument with him and he told me to leave. &quot;I'm telling you to leave the company premises!&quot; I have a witness  ...</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:49:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/is-this-wrongful-termination-florida-t214.htm#1040</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/is-this-wrongful-termination-florida-t214.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>UNEMPLOYMENT PROCEDINGS</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/unemployment-procedings-t212.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>nckrystalblue</dc:creator>
			<description>Topic moved from employment law 

Where can I find the &quot;rules&quot; that the hearings, appeals etc. are governed by?

By rules, I mean what the officer/judge/referee (or whatever title he/she esteems themself with) must, can and can't do during a hearing, like recording the session, admitting evidence, swearing in witnesses, objections etc.



Is that outlined in the statute, can I request them from the local office or do I have to belong to the secret society known as the ESC?  </description>
			<category>State Unemployment Insurance.</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:24:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/unemployment-procedings-t212.htm#1034</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/unemployment-procedings-t212.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>FMLA Podcasts.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/website-review-f16/fmla-podcasts-t211.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>Jeff Nowak, a labor and employment attorney at Franczek Radelet (working with corporate H.R managers) has built a FMLA resource web site which he created and update along with his colleagues.

According to Nowak:

The site, which is &quot;recent&quot; and therefore a work in progress, provides resources to attorneys on the FMLA.  Notably, we recently began running on the site a monthly &quot;FMLA Insights Podcast,&quot; where we address a common FMLA situation in a brief podcast, which you can  ...</description>
			<category>Website review</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:04:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/website-review-f16/fmla-podcasts-t211.htm#1033</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/website-review-f16/fmla-podcasts-t211.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pay cut and demotion</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/wage-and-hour-laws-f13/pay-cut-and-demotion-t209.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Mminor</dc:creator>
			<description>In the last few days my husband has been demoted and now has recieved a cut in pay. When he questioned why all he was told is it was because of write ups that he has never seen and that one was a write up for not being at a company party that he did not go to after work. When he asked about the other write ups and the one about not going to the party his employer just walked a way. he has been employed there over 12 yrs, with out a pay raise or cost of living increase in over 3 yrs. any advise  ...</description>
			<category>Wage and Hour Laws</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:04:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/wage-and-hour-laws-f13/pay-cut-and-demotion-t209.htm#1027</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/wage-and-hour-laws-f13/pay-cut-and-demotion-t209.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>comprehensive guide</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/comprehensive-guide-t148.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>CATMANDO8426</dc:creator>
			<description>Im going through the NLRA and the NLRB website and there is a wealth of information there to be had. However is there a comprehensive guide to this information written for the benefit of the layperson. Concerted activities, and what rules have been set forth from the written law, such as wiengarten.</description>
			<category>Labor Law (Union)</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:49:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/comprehensive-guide-t148.htm#748</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/labor-law-union-f2/comprehensive-guide-t148.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Retail Revolution: How Wal-Mart Created a Brave New World of Business&amp;quot; by Nelson Lichtenstein</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/book-review-f15/the-retail-revolution-how-wal-mart-created-a-brave-new-world-of-business-by-nelson-lichtenstein-t207.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>A new book &quot;The Retail Revolution: How Wal-Mart Created a Brave New World of Business&quot; by Nelson Lichtenstein &quot;offers the best account yet of the myriad problems that Wal-Mart employees endure, including the elaborate measures the company has taken to avoid paying workers' compensation to employees injured on the job&quot; according to one review.

 

Wal-Marts anti employee cyjeff approach to workers organizing is well known, this book shows even further how low Wal-Mart will  ...</description>
			<category>Book Review</category>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/book-review-f15/the-retail-revolution-how-wal-mart-created-a-brave-new-world-of-business-by-nelson-lichtenstein-t207.htm#1025</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/book-review-f15/the-retail-revolution-how-wal-mart-created-a-brave-new-world-of-business-by-nelson-lichtenstein-t207.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court Overturns Bankruptcy Order Allowing Airline to Reject CBA</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/court-overturns-bankruptcy-order-allowing-airline-to-reject-cba-t206.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>The recent Teamsters v. Frontier Airlines, No. 09-343, in which the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York found that a bankruptcy court had improperly applied Section 1113 of the Bankruptcy Code in permitting Frontier to walk away from its collective bargaining agreements with its technicians and other workers.  That section of the Bankruptcy Code permits a bankruptcy court to allow a debtor to reject CBAs, but only if rejection is necessary to successful reorganization  ...</description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:02:57 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/court-overturns-bankruptcy-order-allowing-airline-to-reject-cba-t206.htm#1021</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/court-overturns-bankruptcy-order-allowing-airline-to-reject-cba-t206.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How long does it take to become a lawyer and what schooling</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/students-f18/how-long-does-it-take-to-become-a-lawyer-and-what-schooling-t202.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>nckrystalblue</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<font color="red">POST SPLIT TO STUDENT FORUM BY JOEC</font>
<br />
 
<br />
How long does it take to become a lawyer and what schooling is involved?]]></description>
			<category>Students</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:30:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/students-f18/how-long-does-it-take-to-become-a-lawyer-and-what-schooling-t202.htm#993</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/students-f18/how-long-does-it-take-to-become-a-lawyer-and-what-schooling-t202.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Earning Your Time Off</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employee-benefits-plans-f8/earning-your-time-off-t196.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>nckrystalblue</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[Are paid time off accrual methods regulated by any laws?
<br />

<br />
Does an employee have to work 365 days before they &quot;earn&quot; any of their vacation time? I don't mean having the ability to take it, just the entitlement to it.]]></description>
			<category>Employee benefits plans</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:57:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employee-benefits-plans-f8/earning-your-time-off-t196.htm#954</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employee-benefits-plans-f8/earning-your-time-off-t196.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Promised Wages...</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/promised-wages-t203.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>nckrystalblue</dc:creator>
			<description>Does this only relate to actual per hour wages or is this inclusive of other 'benefits' as well such as Performance Reviews and Pay Raises if they are included in the handbook or other forms of notice (§ 95-25.13.) with the other company &quot;policies&quot;?</description>
			<category>Employment Law</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 02:58:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/promised-wages-t203.htm#1002</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/promised-wages-t203.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Unionized auto workers making $73. an hour?  McGruff here taking a bite out of bogus numbers.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/unionized-auto-workers-making-73-an-hour-mcgruff-here-taking-a-bite-out-of-bogus-numbers-t105.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>JoeC (McGruff)</dc:creator>
			<description>Really?! NOT. Big Three workers aren’t making anything close to $73 an hour (which would translate to about $150,000 a year) General Motors, Ford and Chrysler workers make significantly more than their counterparts at Toyota, Honda and Nissan plants in this country.  Detroit’s unionized work force: roughly $55 an hour. It’s a little more than twice as much as the typical American worker makes, benefits included. The more relevant comparison, though, is probably to Honda’s or Toyota’s (non unionized)  ...</description>
			<category>Current Issues</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 01:38:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/unionized-auto-workers-making-73-an-hour-mcgruff-here-taking-a-bite-out-of-bogus-numbers-t105.htm#557</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/current-issues-f21/unionized-auto-workers-making-73-an-hour-mcgruff-here-taking-a-bite-out-of-bogus-numbers-t105.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How to Read A statute...</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/unsure-miscellaneous-f26/how-to-read-a-statute-t200.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>nckrystalblue</dc:creator>
			<description>this is ONLY for example. I'm not referring, implying or otherwise trying to use this code other than to figure out what parts of it mean   



§ 95&#8209;25.13.  Notification, posting, and records.

(removed sections 1-3 as they didn't have anything other than text)



(4)       Furnish each employee with an itemized statement of deductions made from that employee's wages under G.S. 95&#8209;25.8 for each pay period such deductions are made. (1975, c. 413, s. 7; 1979, c. 839, s. 1; 1981,  ...</description>
			<category>Unsure-Miscellaneous</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:00:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/unsure-miscellaneous-f26/how-to-read-a-statute-t200.htm#986</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/unsure-miscellaneous-f26/how-to-read-a-statute-t200.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mandatory UnEmployment Employer Appeals</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/mandatory-unemployment-employer-appeals-t201.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>nckrystalblue</dc:creator>
			<description>NC mandates that the employer appeal all claims that make it through the initial adjudicator's hands. I had this happen to me in 2006 but didn't know at the time it was a law, I thought it was personal. In my case it was the top office manager who represented the company and we held it via phone. Was simple, and didn't require an in person hearing. I'm asking because someone told me today their hearing was postponed because the &quot;president&quot; was going to a Corporate convention. 



Would  ...</description>
			<category>State Unemployment Insurance.</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:04:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/mandatory-unemployment-employer-appeals-t201.htm#994</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/state-unemployment-insurance-f24/mandatory-unemployment-employer-appeals-t201.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>fired while still under workerscomp? North Carolina.</title>
			<link>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/fired-while-still-under-workerscomp-north-carolina-t195.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>nckrystalblue</dc:creator>
			<description>  POST MOVED

 

Forgive me if posting related topic in existing (old) thread is not permitted...really don't need another LLT type butt chewing 



Does NC have any such Tort rule or something similar? 



EE was on WC since 7/07 working varied hours w/modified duty. Had surgery 2/08 and was on &quot;filing duty&quot; (at the job's direction) for 3 hours a day 5 days a week for the past 14 months. Suddenly the job tried to put him back to full time work cleaning (not his hired job nor &quot;light  ...</description>
			<category>Employment Law</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/fired-while-still-under-workerscomp-north-carolina-t195.htm#952</comments>
			<guid>http://joeslegalforum.forumotion.net/employment-law-f1/fired-while-still-under-workerscomp-north-carolina-t195.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>